The Times admits '˜mistake' in leaving Hillsborough story off front page

The Times newspaper has said it 'made a mistake' by not including coverage of the Hillsborough inquests on the front page of its first edition.
Relatives of the victims who died in the Hillsborough disaster outside the Hillsborough Inquest in Warrington, where the inquest jury concluded that the 96 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Tuesday April 26, 2016. See PA story INQUEST Hillsborough. Photo credit should read: Owen Humphreys/PA WireRelatives of the victims who died in the Hillsborough disaster outside the Hillsborough Inquest in Warrington, where the inquest jury concluded that the 96 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Tuesday April 26, 2016. See PA story INQUEST Hillsborough. Photo credit should read: Owen Humphreys/PA Wire
Relatives of the victims who died in the Hillsborough disaster outside the Hillsborough Inquest in Warrington, where the inquest jury concluded that the 96 Liverpool fans who died in the Hillsborough disaster were unlawfully killed. PRESS ASSOCIATION Photo. Picture date: Tuesday April 26, 2016. See PA story INQUEST Hillsborough. Photo credit should read: Owen Humphreys/PA Wire

The paper faced criticism, along with its sister paper The Sun, for not featuring on its front page the story that an inquest jury had ruled that 96 Liverpool fans who died in the 1989 tragedy were unlawfully killed.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In a statement posted on Twitter, the paper said: “The Times led with Hillsborough coverage on all our digital editions throughout the day.

Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".
Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".

“This morning we have covered it extensively in the paper with two spreads, the back page, a top leader and an interactive on the victims.

“We made a mistake with the front page of our first edition, and we fixed it for the second edition.”

A photo of the families outside the Warrington court room appeared on later editions of The Times, along with a trailer for its coverage that ran into several pages, including an editorial comment.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

The Sun came in for particular criticism, having run a front page story proclaiming to tell “The Truth” four days after the disaster.

Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".
Handout photos issued by The Times of the front page of their first edition of today's newspaper (left) and their second edition (right), as The Times said it "made a mistake" with the front page of its first edition which did not include any coverage of the Hillsborough inquests, adding that "we fixed it for the second edition".

The article featured claims from an anonymous policeman that some fans had “picked pockets of victims”, “urinated on cops” and that some beat up a policeman giving the “kiss of life”.

Despite not covering the verdict of the two-year inquest on the front page, which cleared the fans of any fault, the paper ran a double-page spread on the outcome, and covered it in their main leader.

The leader stated that after 27 years, the “Hillsborough families finally have their first measure of justice”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

It added: “Whether they get more is in the hands of the CPS. We hope they do.

“The horror that befell Liverpool fans was, as the inquest has now found, the fault of catastrophic police blunders - specifically by former Chief Superintendent David Duckenfield - which were shamefully then covered up.

“Failures by the ambulance service were also to blame, as was the design of the Sheffield stadium.

“The supporters were not to blame. But the police smeared them with a pack of lies which in 1989 The Sun and others in the media swallowed whole.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

“We apologised prominently 12 years ago, again four years ago on the front page, and do so unreservedly again now.

“Further, we pay tribute to the admirable tenacity of the friends and relatives over so many years on behalf of the 96 who died.”

The absence of coverage of the Hillsborough inquest on Wednesday’s front page led to criticism of the paper, with many on Twitter voicing their opinions.

Impressionist and comedian Rory Bremner tweeted that the relegation of the story to pages eight and nine was “extraordinary”.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

On Tuesday night “The Sun” became a trending topic on Twitter in the United Kingdom, with more than 124,000 tweets using the term.

Actor Stephen Mangan questioned: “Wait - neither @TheSun nor @thetimes mention Hillsborough on their front pages?!”

In 2012 The Sun ran a front page called “The Real Truth” in which the paper announced they were “profoundly sorry for false reports”.

On Tuesday former editor of The Sun Kelvin MacKenzie, who oversaw the story published in 1989 blaming fans, also apologised for the “hurt” the story caused.

Hide Ad
Hide Ad

In a statement he said: “Today’s verdicts are an important step in obtaining justice for the victims. My heart goes out to those who have waited so long for vindication.

“As I have said before, the headline I published was wrong and I am profoundly sorry for the hurt it caused.”

Talking on Sky News’s press preview, The Sun’s political editor Tom Newton Dunn said the police are at the “core” of the whole story and the paper were misled by them.

He said if people are still angry over the 1989 front page he “completely understands”, adding: “We deserve everything that is thrown our way.”